In this inaugural interview of the Siemens Xcelerator Community Thought Leadership series, David Erhard, host of the Xcelerator Community, and Bill Johnston of Structure3C speak with Jason Frasca and Iain Kerr, co-authors of Innovating Emergent Futures and co-founders of the Emergent Futures Lab.
In a wide-ranging conversation, they interrogate the dominant âideas-firstâ approach to innovation and introduce an experience-based ecological methodology. Drawing on examples from evolutionary biology, public transit, and their own academic and consulting work, they lay out a provocative case for why innovation must begin not in the mind, but in the world.
On the Limits of âIdeas-Basedâ Innovation
Frasca and Kerr begin by challenging the assumption that innovation starts with good ideas.
âClassically, we think and define creativity and innovation as all about ideasâcoming up with new ideas and then putting them into action,â said Kerr. âItâs a kind of ideate-plan-make model.â
But this approach breaks down when weâre trying to create something truly new:
âIf somethingâs really innovative and novel, we donât have the words, we donât have the imagesâit doesnât exist. So how could you ideate it whatsoever? Thereâs a logical fallacy there⌠weâre barking up the wrong tree.â
Instead, he argues, â[Novel] ideas emerge. Ideas come late in the process.â
The Four Tasks: Engage, Disclose, Deviate, Co-Emerge
Bill Johnston asked the duo to unpack the framework outlined in their book.
Kerr explained: âIf âideateâ is usually thought of as the first step, we want to completely shift to something like âengageââwhere youâre genuinely embedded in something. You understand it in an embodied, experimental way.â
He described âDiscloseâ as a process of identifying and blocking the familiar logics that typically go unquestioned: âYouâre not trying to figure out what should we do⌠youâre doing the oppositeâwhat should we not do?â
âDeviate,â he continued, is about leaving behind established frameworks and âdeveloping a new way of thinking about it, framing it, engaging it.â And finally, âCo-emergeâ refers to âbending the new direction into something practical and impactful.â
Frasca added: âTheyâre all kind of happening all the time in varying degrees and looping back and forward upon each other.â
ďťż
ďťż
World-Making: More Than Changing Your Mindset
In response to a question about the concept of âworld-making,â Kerr said:
âYou could say we have to change our worldview⌠but all of that is disembodied. Itâs about ideas. We say: get out there, poke around, stumble on things. Weâre not creatures who live in our headsâwe do things, and as we do things, we change our environment, and our environment changes us.â
He stressed that this approach is fundamentally different from âimagining youâre going to innovate from a room with fake grass and whiteboards.â
âWeâre in the middle of ongoing world-making⌠as we shift the world, new possibilities emerge.â
Practical Wisdom for Innovators: Asking âWhat Can This Do?â
When asked what advice they would offer to members of the Siemens Xcelerator Communityâmany of whom work in complex, high-stakes industrial settingsâFrasca and Kerr emphasized the importance of reframing how we perceive challenges and opportunities.
Frasca offered a story he and Kerr often use to kick off workshops:
âWe show a picture of a four-way intersection with a traffic light and a holiday nutcracker next to it. We ask: âAre these the same thing?â Most people say, âOf course not.â But then we tell the story of crows in Japan.â
âCrows perch on wires near intersections. When the light turns red, they swoop down, drop a nut in front of the stopped cars, then fly back up. When the light turns green, the cars crack the nuts. The light turns red again, and the crow comes back to collect its meal.â
âTo the crow, the intersection is a nutcracker. It doesnât ask, âWhat is this?â It asks, âWhat can this do?â And then, âWhat else can this do?ââ
That mindsetâasking what systems and tools can do, not what they areâis foundational to emergent innovation.
Frasca concluded: âAt some point, we have to leave our heads and engage physically with the thing weâre trying to innovate. That means embodying, experimenting, and actively doingâbecause thatâs where the real insights come from.â
Kerr built on this by advocating for an organizational shift in mindset and practice: âTrust your people. Trust your ecosystem. Run workshops that let people experience this emergent, experimental logic firsthand. Donât focus on generating better ideasâfocus on creating the conditions where novel possibilities can emerge.â
âYou want to create an ecosystem that shifts from generating the same outcomes every day to one that can also produce something new. That means redesigning how teams work, how HR supports innovation, how space and time are allocated. Itâs not about having an innovation team off to the sideâitâs about enabling innovation to spontaneously emerge across the organization.â
Their combined advice is a powerful invitation: Think like a crow, act like a system. Block assumptions, follow affordances, and trust that novel outcomes will co-emergeânot from the top down, but from the inside out.
Wrapping It Up
Throughout the conversation, one theme remained unmistakably clear: innovation is not a detached or abstract exercise. Frasca and Kerr donât just offer a new method; they invite a fundamental shift in how we perceive innovation itself. For leaders navigating complexity, their message is clear: transformation begins not with better ideas, but with better ways of seeing, sensing, and participating in the systems we seek to change.
Further reading: